Ethical consideration of Pedophilia: A Flaw in Hacking

Hacking’s piece argues the causal understanding, if it is known by those who are being understood (diagnosed), can change their character so that they become a different ‘kind’ of a person. He claims that we are susceptible to this notion is our creation of stories to help explain the past. Thereby, if diagnosed with a particular mental illness due to the events in our past, it changes the outlook on the kind of individual that we used to be (368). Consider the example of a victim of pedophilia or child molestation (addressed briefly, 369). The implication is that the change in the mentality of the victim is a cause of being diagnosed as a victim of a traumatic incident as opposed to any factual evidence. In addressing only the negative effect of the diagnosis, such that being a victim of pedophilia or child molestation is a cause of depression, etc., Hacking seems disregard the moral issues surrounding these allegations. Perhaps the cause of the depression may be something entirely different, but Hacking is a little hasty in claiming that these causes are not causes for moral consideration, which ought to and do affect people or the ‘kind’ of persons, irrespective of whether the depression is a direct cause of their childhood experiences. 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s