The business of selling disease

In Healy’s article, “Shaping the Intimate: Influences on the Experience of Everyday Nerves”, the ways in which pharmaceutical marketing can shape the culture of disease, the practice of medicine, and culture of the general population is discussed. I was taken by the degree to which drug companies can exercise control over medical professionals through marketing practices. For example, by rebranding tranquillizers as anxiolytic antidepressants, the pharmaceutical industry was able to remove the negative association of dependence from SSRIs such as Paxil. Despite the fact that SSRIs were still being prescribed, the term dependence was successfully removed from psychiatrists vocabulary (and patient conversations, presumably) due to strategic marketing (339-340). Here it appears the best interest of the patient failed to be protected due to the marketing efforts of drug companies.
In marketing to the general population, clinical trials are used by drug companies to transform experiences of a certain subset of the population into homogenized experiences (236), enlarging the audience to which a product can be marketed. Healy argues this is also present in the proliferation of risk marketing: he points to the marketing of risk factors (such as elevated blood pressure) over that of specific diseases (like strokes or heart attacks) in order to sell antihypertensives (237). Not only does this make it easier to obtain approval to sell the drugs, but marketing risk factors also captures a larger audience than would marketing the disease itself. In the case of antihypertensives, the medicalization of risk factors allows for massive profits even though “these products…may have little impact on the wider state of the health of the population” (237). Here we see a disease culture being formed: the population is made aware they have a ‘problem’ (a risk factor) by the very company who happens to have the solution.
This manipulation allows pharmaceutical companies to create and market disease to popular culture. In making disease fashionable through the use of celebrity endorsement or awareness campaigns, advertising the solution (the drug) comes second to the advertisement of the problem (the disease). In short, the conclusion drawn from Healy’s article is that drug companies are in the business of marketing and selling disease: a creation of a drug necessitates the creation of a disease that makes the drug medically necessary where it was not before. What concerns me now is the strength and ability of regulators to prevent conflicts of interest between actors and negotiate regulations for marketing that is in the best interest of the patient.

Advertisements
Quote | This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to The business of selling disease

  1. Sangwoo says:

    it makes sense to marketize a symptom which is more easy to be alleviated rather than the disease which is not easily cured. so people would be more aware of the observable changes in one thing like lowering high blood pressure than long term care like keeping occurences of stroke or heart attack at bay. it is concerning, as you say and i agree, because a disease requires much more attention than to just one symptom, but actually a change of life style potentially. it seems that a risk factor is made a disease. (possibly people’s laziness, or ignorance contributes to the manipulation?)
    I saw a korean movie about a mutated parasite, Gordioida, called Deranged(2012), where a drug company comes up with this parasite normally in insects hosts now in human hosts, killing millions of people. drug company keeps the drug away so it would be scarce and the demand would be high. the company attempts to force the government to sign a contract for the drug formula in compensation of astronomical money. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0bdZKzRgyo) it shows that a pharm. company can have a huge influence on the creation of the disease as you and Healy would argue. (another instance like osteoporosis, menopause, erectile dysfunction…etc.)

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s